Blog Debate #1 "Is Pornagraphy Adultery? "

Pornography has been of form of entertainment for centuries and continues to dominated in the market, but it also brought in some skeptic wives into the scene and the fear of losing the spouse to the imaginary women of the Internet. Some cannot stress the fact of people they have never physically seen at all should be charged for their negligence. Pornography just helps create the illusion of what some people see as adultery, but in reality is just a date with "fantasy".
Porn has been form of people controlling their sexual desires from going overboard and stick with the women you find on browsing the Internet than go commit rape or have an affair with a real women. Though this may seem a bit indecent for some to understand and goes against their morals, the relationship between the women in the video is nothing but a short infatuation. There were never a sense of emotion between the user and the lusty stars found in the video. Of course, porn is not entirely a healthy substitute for the sexually depraved. People are bit skeptic with the fact that porn creates some sexual desires amongst them and attempt to further explore the realm of the porn industry if one has the proper contacts and/or money to fulfill their desires.
As people closely try to relate pornography with adultery, it can be harmful for one's relationship for those who cannot accept the fact that people can see porn on their own free will. Pornography would be place the blame for the curious user who's spouse was less open about their usage. If one were to commit adultery, the user might as well set himself with a real woman than stick around the Internet.

Alexander Pope "An Essay on Criticism"

Pope's "An Essay on Criticism" is a definite work of art and provides an brilliant insight on how people tend to stand by their arguments and their judgment. Though the old English diction maybe a bit of struggle for people who are accustomed to reading modern works, this piece manages to pass through the test of time. This poem has the standard scheme of having words with a similar sound at the end of the word match with another word from a different line was there in order to create an omniscient sound throughout the piece as if it were the rules of criticism were intended it to be.

His massive poem could be a form of what people should try to structure their argument to be worthy enough to raise a few eyebrows from the opposing side and send a point a across. Of course, your judgment should be not be entirely biased, but informed by your opponent's ideas during the course. Its safe to bring up the opposing side's view in your own perspective just try bring down their point with helpful sources. As crucial as it is to have a belief, it could potentially ruin your point if all you can stress out about. Just note the fact that people could be critics regardless of how good or bad they are at it with a tendency of voicing an opinion.